shemos – מורשת התורה | הרב אליעזר שמחה וויס שליט"א | האתר הרשמי https://ravweisz.co.il מאמרים ודברי תורה של הרב אליעזר שמחה וייס לפרשות השבוע ולמועדים במעגל השנה Mon, 09 Jun 2025 22:55:04 +0000 he-IL hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2 https://ravweisz.co.il/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/לוגו-מעודכן-מורשת-התורה-100x100.png shemos – מורשת התורה | הרב אליעזר שמחה וויס שליט"א | האתר הרשמי https://ravweisz.co.il 32 32 *With Hashem's help, we will not give up*! https://ravweisz.co.il/with-hashems-help-we-will-not-give-up/ https://ravweisz.co.il/with-hashems-help-we-will-not-give-up/#respond Mon, 09 Jun 2025 22:54:31 +0000 https://ravweisz.co.il/?p=11378

..

*With Hashem's help, we will not give up*!

There is a principle: (סופו נעוץ בתחילתו ותחילתו בסופו)  ."Their end is attached to their beginning, and their beginning to their end". The end and the beginning are connected to one another. Even the beginning and end of each book of the Torah are  connected  and there is a common theme  between the opening and closing sections.

Pekudei is the last parsha of the book of Shemot. Therefore, we must find the connection between the end of the book of Shemot and its beginning.

At the beginning of the book of Shemot, we find the story of Pharaoh's daughter who stretched out her hand to take the baby she saw in the Nile River. It is written: "וַתֵּרֶד בַּת־פַּרְעֹה לִרְחֹץ עַל־הַיְאֹר וְהַאֲחוֹתֶיהָ הִתְהַלַּכְנָה עַל־יַד הַיְאֹר וַתִּרְא אֶת־הַתֵּבָה בַּגֹּמֶא וַתִּשְׁלַח אֶת־אֲמָתָהּ וַתִּקָּחֶנָּה" (Shemot 2:5). The commentary on the words "and she sent her arm (amata)" quoted by Rashi expounds the word (amata  to mean arm and the verse  to  means that her actual arm elongated many cubits.

 

את אמתה. …… וְרַבּוֹתֵינוּ דָּרְשׁוּ (סוטה שם), לְשׁוֹן יָד, …. דָּרְשׁוּ אֶת אֲמָתָהּ – אֶת יָדָהּ, וְנִשְׁתַּרְבְּבָה אַמָּתָהּ אַמּוֹת הַרְבֵּה: (רש"י שמות ב' ה')

.

At the end of the book of Shemot, the Mishkan was completed and ready for be erected, but no one was able to raise it up, since it was so heavy. Therefore, it was brought to Moshe to deal with erecting it.

How was Moses supposed to raise up something so heavy, when everyone together had failed?

Rashi tells us (39:33) that God told him: "Put your hand to it, and then it will stand up by itself" (שְׁמוֹת ל״ט:לג, Shemot 39:33):

  ויביאו את המשכן וגו'. שֶׁלֹּא הָיוּ יְכוֹלִין לַהֲקִימוֹ; וּלְפִי שֶׁלֹּא עָשָׂה מֹשֶׁה שׁוּם מְלָאכָה בַמִּשְׁכָּן, הִנִּיחַ לוֹ הַקָּבָּ"ה הֲקָמָתוֹ, שֶׁלֹּא הָיָה יָכוֹל לַהֲקִימוֹ שׁוּם אָדָם מֵחֲמַת כֹּבֶד הַקְּרָשִׁים, שֶׁאֵין כֹּחַ בָּאָדָם לְזָקְפָן, וּמֹשֶׁה הֶעֱמִידוֹ; אָמַר מֹשֶׁה לִפְנֵי הַקָּבָּ"ה אֵיךְ אֶפְשָׁר הֲקָמָתוֹ עַ"יְ אָדָם? אָמַר לוֹ עֲסֹק אַתָּה בְּיָדְךָ, וְנִרְאֶה כִּמְקִימוֹ וְהוּא נִזְקָף וְקָם מֵאֵלָיו, וְזֶהוּ שֶׁנֶּ' הוּקַם הַמִּשְׁכָּן (שמות מ') – הוּקַם מֵאֵלָיו; מִדְרַשׁ רַ' תַנְחוּמָא:  (רש"י שְׁמוֹת ל״ט:לג)

They brought the mishkon, etc. — for they were unable to erect it. Because Moshe did no work whatsoever in the mishkon God left it for him to erect, for no man was able to erect it because of the weight of the planks for no man had the strength to stand them up, but Moshe stood them up. [Actually, Moshe himself could also not do it but…] Moshe said to God: How is it possible for man to erect it? [Whereupon] He answered him: “You busy yourself with your hand”! It appeared as if he (Moshe) had erected it but it had stood upright of its own. This is what is meant by what is said: “The mishkon was erected” — it was erected on its own. From the Midrash of Rabbi Tanchuma.(Rashi , Shemot 39:33 )

 

Now, at the beginning of the book of Shemot, we see that Pharaoh's daughter performed an impossible task when she succeeded in obtaining the basket in the Nile . But the question is asked: At first, for what reason did Pharaoh's daughter stretch out her hand to take the basket, when she saw that it was far away from her?

Granted, Moshe performed the impossible in erecting the Mishkan when God told him to try, "Apply labor with your hands."

From where did Pharaoh's daughter know that she would succeed in doing the impossible, that a miracle would happen to her and her arm would be elongated?

Rather, she merely did what was within her ability and power to do, and God blessed her efforts. This teaches us a valuable lesson: We should never refrain from undertaking a task that seems too difficult to attain. If we do what we are supposed to do, with sincere effort, God will bless us with success.

We must remember the words of Rabbi Tarfon:

"פִּרְקֵי אָבוֹת פרק ב משנה טז: "לֹא עָלֶיךָ הַמְּלָאכָה לִגְמֹר, וְלֹא אַתָּה בֶן חוֹרִין לִבְטֵל. " (Pirkei Avot 2:16)  It is not incumbent upon you to complete the task, but you are not free to desist from it ….

Many aspirations are not realized because of the thought: "I will not be able to do it all," or "I will never succeed." Maximalism, the pursuit of perfection, and the failure to appreciate partial achievements – all these are the undoing of countless people.

Every achievement is valuable. Even if the path to the summit is blocked, any ascent up the mountain is considered an ascent.

We are not free to "throw up our hands" and despair; we are not permitted to give up and fail to realize the good ideas that arise in our minds. We shall do what is within our ability to do – and we will come out ahead.

Shabbat Shalom and may we blessed the success of our soldiers, the healing of the wounded, and the return of the captives

!חזק חזק ונתחזק

*Rabbi Eliezer Simcha Weisz, Member of the Chief Rabbinate Council of Israel*.

 

]]>
https://ravweisz.co.il/with-hashems-help-we-will-not-give-up/feed/ 0
Vayakhel Parshat Hachodesh and 4 cups of wine https://ravweisz.co.il/vayakhel-parshat-hachodesh-and-4-cups-of-wine/ https://ravweisz.co.il/vayakhel-parshat-hachodesh-and-4-cups-of-wine/#respond Wed, 26 Jan 2022 09:22:44 +0000 https://ravweisz.co.il/?p=8810

Vayakhel Parshat Hachodesh and 4 cups of wine

The Talmud Yerushalmi (Megillah 25b) makes an enigmatic statement: “The reading of Parshat Para (3rd of the 4 Parshiot) and HaChodesh (last of the 4) must take place on two consecutive weeks.  The reason for this is that there is a parallel to the law that one is not allowed to interrupt (by drinking other wine) between the third and fourth cup at the Pesach Seder“.

 

What does this mean and how are the two related?  What is the connection between the Four Parshiot (Parashiot Shekalim [contributions to the tent of Meeting], Zachor [Remember Amalek], Para [Red Heifer] and Hachodesh [Establishing a new month]) and the Four Cups of wine drank at the Seder?  Within the Torah literature, the four special Torah portions read at this time of year are referred to as one unit, “the Arba Parshiot”. Each of these parshiot is read because of its own, independent importance and particular message relevant to the time of being read  they are not joined in a united theme.  Yet it would seem that there is a philosophical bond between these four Torah readings that does not seem only coincidental. What is this relationship between each of “the Arba Parshiot” and what is the special connection between the 3rd and the 4th Parsha?

 

What is the overriding theme that connects Parashot Shekalim, Zachor, Para,and Hachodesh ?  These parshiot are meant to  enable us to prepare for the upcoming experience of freedom and renewal on Pesach.  An essential aspect of Pesach is that each of us must feel as if we were slaves in Egypt and then experience, through the Seder, the moment of liberation.

 

Are we slaves who have to be redeemed from slavery?   Although we are not slaves to people as in the days of old, we are sometimes slaves to our ambitions and aspirations.  We wish to excel in some sphere of activity.   Some of us are slaves to the pursuit of wealth, others to power and yet others to the pursuit of knowledge.

 

Yirmiyahu (Jeremiah) states that a person should not boast about his wisdom, wealth, or strength. Rather, he should work to know Hashem. This is the secret of the four Parshiot. They guide us to properly use wisdom, wealth, and strength. A slave is not free to utilize these gifts as long as he is subjugated by his master. Therefore, as Pesach nears, and with it the experience of freedom and renewal, we remind ourselves once again how to channel our strengths in the right direction.  Shekalim refers to wealth and is about a communal mitzva that hints that we should use our possessions for Torah and mitzvot. In 19th century England there lived a famous Jewish philanthropist Sir Moses Montefiore. Queen Victoria once asked him, “Sir Moses, what is the extent of your wealth? How much do you own?” Sir Moses told her it would take a few days to do some accounting, and afterwards, he would reply. When Sir Moses told her his wealth she became upset saying, “This is offensive. Everyone knows that you have far greater wealth.” Sir Moses explained that he considered as his true wealth whatever money he gave to Tzedakah (Charity). Anything else that he possessed was only temporary and could be confiscated or lost.

Many people with wealth are controlled by it and feel that they can control others through it. Parshat Shekalim is about teaching us the proper use of our possessions.

 

Parshat Zachor is about strength. Amalek used his strength inappropriately.  We are enjoined to utilize strength productively, by wiping out evil.  Those of us who are valiant feel that we can use our power against others.  We are slaves to our own might.

 

Parshat Para corresponds to wisdom.  Para Adumah is the classic statute (chok) that defies rational thinking. The same mitzva that purifies also causes impurity. Para Adumah teaches us the right way to use wisdom. Unfettered wisdom is dangerous. Torah wisdom is governed and limited by Hashem’s command.

 

Parshat Hachodesh symbolizes Matan Torah. It describes Kiddush Hachodesh, the first mitzva given to us as a nation.  As Pesach approaches, we prepare to experience true freedom and renewal by releasing ourselves from the shackles of self slavery and use our gifts and talents for spiritual matters and worshipping the Almighty.

 

The Four Parshiot  are thus a preparation towards Pesah and represent stages in the spiritual redemption from the bonds of self slavery.

1- Shekalim is learning the correct use of wealth

2- Zachor is about learning the correct use of power

3 – Parah is about learning the correct use of knowledge

4- HaChodesh is the statement of the subduing of all our gifts to the will of Hashem.

 

The Maharal clairifies the advent of the four expressions found which connote the Jew’s redemption from Egypt (I took you out, I redeemed you, I saved you, I brought you ).

These expressions of salvation refer to the fact that Hashem saved the Bnei Yisrael from three types of oppression with which He had told Abraham the Bnei Yisael  would experience being a) sojourners, b) slaves and those c) tortured. These are the first three expressions of redemption. To what does the last expression of salvation refer?  The answer is that the Israelits were not” freed from” servitude but were” freed   in order ” to be My Nation!”. Freedom from oppression was  automatically to lead to the relationship which they will have with Hashem.

 

The connection between the Four Parshiot and the Four Cups now emerges. The Four Cups at the Seder represent the freedom from the three subjugators, and the fourth cup must then come next without interruption, as it hints to the  purpose of freedom –the ultimate connection to Hashem. So too, in the realm of spiritual freedom, the first three Parshiot represent freedom from earthly realms and the fourth must come uninterrupted, connoting the bond to Hashem that results from Man’s efforts to cleanse himself.

 

 

שחמט דיגיטל
האתר שלך קינג

]]>
https://ravweisz.co.il/vayakhel-parshat-hachodesh-and-4-cups-of-wine/feed/ 0
Tezaveh – Purim https://ravweisz.co.il/tezaveh-purim/ https://ravweisz.co.il/tezaveh-purim/#respond Wed, 26 Jan 2022 09:21:24 +0000 https://ravweisz.co.il/?p=8805

Tezaveh – Purim

1)                  Prohibition of eulogizing and fasting: The 14th and 15th of Adar (Purim and Shushan Purim) are days of feasting and joy. Therefore, eulogizing and fasting are forbidden to everyone, everywhere, in both open and walled cities.

2)                  A mourner during the Shivah (Week of Mourning) period should not show signs of mourning in public on the two days of Purim, the 14th and 15th of Adar whether in an open or a walled city. The mourner should not sit on the floor or remove his shoes – but maintain those aspects of mourning done in privacy, as on Shabbat.

Despite the prohibition of mourning on Purim, the day itself counts as one of the seven days of mourning (Shivah).

3)         The Reading of the Megillah (Scroll of Purim story): If possible, the mourner should assemble a Minyan (quorum of 10 adult males) in his home for prayers and the reading of the Megillah.  Otherwise, he may go to the Synagogue to hear the reading of the Megillah for the required reading both at night and the following day. If he is in the Synagogue for Shabbat services he should stay on for reading of the Megilla, if this occurs immediately after Shabbat.

 4)         Gifts to the Poor and Sending Purim Parcels (Mishloah Manot, portions of food): A mourner, even during the Shivah period, must observe the commandments of gifts to the poor and sending Mishloah Manot to a friend, but should only send the minimum (to two people) required for the fulfillment of the commandment (mitzvah). In any event, the mourner should not send things which cause joy. A mourner cannot receive Mishloah Manot for the entire year of mourning.

Usually the greeting “Shalom” implies that life is normal and that people are in a state of joy.  As such, it is not an appropriate form of greeting in to someone in the year of mourning; similarly, sending Mishloah Manot is a form of greeting and inappropriate to send to a mourner.

 

שחמט דיגיטל
האתר שלך קינג

]]>
https://ravweisz.co.il/tezaveh-purim/feed/ 0
Tezaveh-Can Avelim send Mishloach Manot or E-cards https://ravweisz.co.il/tezaveh-can-avelim-send-mishloach-manot-or-e-cards/ https://ravweisz.co.il/tezaveh-can-avelim-send-mishloach-manot-or-e-cards/#respond Wed, 26 Jan 2022 09:19:46 +0000 https://ravweisz.co.il/?p=8800

Tezaveh-Can Avelim send Mishloach Manot or E-cards ?

 

 QUESTION:

Can Avelim send Mishloach Manot? If not why not? & if there’s a restriction, does it include E-cards that are basically  donations to a worthwhile causes. What other restrictions are there for Avelim on Purim?

 

ANSWER

Prohibition of eulogizing and fasting:

The 14th and 15th of Adar are days of feasting and gladness, therefore eulogizing and fasting are forbidden to everyone, in both open and walled cities. A Aveil during the Shiva (first week) period should not show signs of mourning in public on these two days of Purim. He should not sit on the floor or remove his shoes – but rather do only those aspects of mourning done in privacy, as on Shabbat. Despite the prohibition of mourning on Purim, the day itself counts as one of the seven Shiva days

 The Reading of the Megillah:

If the Aveil is able to assemble a Minyan (10 adult males) in his home for prayers and the reading of the Megillah, he should do so if possible. Otherwise, he is permitted to go to the Synagogue to hear the reading of the Megillah, at night and the following morning. If he is in Synagogue for Shabbat services he should stay on for the reading of the Megillah immediately after Shabbat.

 Gifts to the Poor and Misloah Manot (Purim food parcels):

There is a Mitzvah to send a gift of two types of food to at least one friend on the day of Purim, as the Megillah says, ‘And sending portions, one to another.’ The portions should be ready to eat, and appropriate for consumption at the Purim feast, since one of the purposes of this Mitzvah is to help augment people’s Purim feasts. This is called “Mishloah Manot” (lit. sending portions).

A mourner, even during the Shiva period, must observe the commandments of gifts to the poor and sending portions of food to a friend, but he should only send something necessary for the fulfillment of the commandment. In any case he should not send things which cause joy. One does not send portions of food to an Aveil on Purim during the entire period of mourning. “Mourner” refers to one who is within the year after losing a parent, or one who is within 30 days after losing a spouse, sibling or child.

Although one should refrain from directing Mishloah Manot to an Aveil, when a person has a relationship with any other member of the avel’s household, that person may address the Mishloah Manot to the other members of the avel’s family and send it to them.   Usually greeting another person with the greeting “Shalom” implies that life is normal and that people are in a state of joy; as such it is not appropriate to use such a greeting to someone in the year of morning; similarly, sending Mishloah Manot is a form of greeting and inappropriate to send to Aveil.(Many Sefaradim are not particular about not sending Mishloach Manot to an Aveil

 There are no restrictions for the Aveil concerning the mitzvah of Matanot l’evyonim and an Aveil can definitely send e cards. May we know only happy occasions, and experience no mourning.

]]>
https://ravweisz.co.il/tezaveh-can-avelim-send-mishloach-manot-or-e-cards/feed/ 0
Tezaveh-Tzitz Geulah and Megilat Esther https://ravweisz.co.il/tezaveh-tzitz-geulah-and-megilat-esther/ https://ravweisz.co.il/tezaveh-tzitz-geulah-and-megilat-esther/#respond Wed, 26 Jan 2022 09:18:16 +0000 https://ravweisz.co.il/?p=8795

Tezaveh-Tzitz Geulah and Megilat Esther

The Mishna in Avot (6:6) says that “anyone who repeats a saying in the name of the one who said it brings- Geulah- redemption to the world”. When we quote a person we ensure the continuation of tradition.

A discussion in the Talmud about the tzitz, the headplate that the Kohen Gadol wore while serving in the Temple (Beit Hamikdash), and on which the words Kodesh la’Hashem ( Holy to G-d) were inscribed, highlights the importance of tradition. According to a Braita (Shabbat 63):

1. The Tzitz was a golden plate the width of two fingers which was a band crossing the forehead from ear to ear.

2. ‘Kodesh la’Hashem’ was written on it in two lines – ‘Hashem’ was written on top [on the left], ‘Kodesh’ and the letter ‘Lamed’ were written on bottom [on the right. R. Tam, cited by Rishonim – ‘Kodesh’ and ‘Lamed’ were on top [on the left], ‘Hashem’ was on bottom, on the right].

3. R. Eliezer b’Rebbi Yosi said that he saw the headband in the treasure-house of Rome – ‘Kodesh la’Hashem’ was written in one line. (Rambam – Chachamim agree that it is Kosher in one line; Me’iri – Chachamim did not accept R. Eliezer’s testimony as eyewitness testimony does not negate the Sages’ tradition, even though some of the greatest of the Sages testified, “I saw it in Rome and ‘Kodesh La Hashem’ was written on it on one line,” [still, an eyewitness] does not disprove that which was known to them”.(Beit Habechirah L’Rabbeinu HaMeiri, Tractate Shabbos 63b).

This debate is remarkable because the Rabbis chose to disagree with Rav Elazar in spite of the clear-cut evidence that he presented. Rav Elazar when in Rome was given the opportunity to enter the Emperor’s storehouse (see Tractate Meeilla 17a-b). In the storehouse, Rav Elazar saw the tzitz, which had been looted by the Romans from the previous Beit Hamikdash, and saw that the words Kodesh la’Hashem were written on one line! How could the Rabbis disagree with such compelling evidence, and furthermore, how could the Rambam rule in accordance with the Rabbis over Rav Elazar?

One possible answer is based on the writings of Rav Eliyahu Dessler in Michtav Me’Eliyahu (vol. 4, pgs. 56-57). He notes that the authors of the Talmud were exceedingly meticulous when citing the original author of a Halacha, one example being Nedarim 8b, where Rav Shimon quotes a Halacha in the name of Rav Yitzchak who was quoting Rav Chiya Aricha who quoted Rav Zeira who quoted Rav Elazar who quoted Rav Chanina who quoted Rav Miyasha who quoted Rebbe Yehuda bar Ilay! The reason for such precision, Rabbi Dessler explains, is to emphasize the importance of mesorah (tradition), the Torah’s chain of Halachic tradition. Laws were passed from generation to generation, bestowing authority on them. Any law that lacks authenticity cannot be considered a law.  Rabbi Dessler explains that even though we might know how things were done in previous generations, if we do not have a direct chain of teachers that pass the laws on to the students, that knowledge loses its status as part of the Oral Law. The Rabbis are subsequently forced to utilize the methods of textual analysis available to them in order to compose a “new law” in Torah Sh’bal Peh (Oral Law). The visual proof of Rav Elazar can only be secondary to the systematic methods contained in Torah Sh’bal Peh. The Rambam recognized that a break in the mesorah had occurred and, acknowledging that Rav Elazar indeed had found a tzitz inscribed in one line, he nevertheless decided that the tzitz’s words should preferably be written on two lines in accordance with majority rule, the view of the Rabbis. There may be many explanations for what Rav Elazar saw.  It could well be that the tzitz he saw was mistakenly written. Indeed, it is interesting to note that the menorah described ob the Arch of Titus in Rome was not of the design used in the Beit Hamikdash

Our discussion about the tzitz clearly highlights the saying quote above (Mishna Avot 6:6). By conveying the Torah Sh’bal Peh in a clear and authentic way, we are able to ensure that all of our laws will remain a part of the oral code in future. 

In addition, the story of the Jews redemption from Haman is also connected with this same saying.  Mordechai, cousin of Queen Esther, overhears a plot to King Ahasuerus’ life. He warns Esther who in turn repeats it to the King in the name of Mordechai, and the would-be assassins Bigtan and Teresh are caught. The incident was then recorded in the King’s diary. Years later, just as Haman is about to approach the King during the night to obtain permission to hang his mortal enemy, Mordechai, Ahasuerus cannot fall sleep. He calls to have his royal chronicles read to him and the same incident – demonstrating Mordechai’s loyalty – was read to him. Ahasuerus realizes that Mordechai, not Haman, is the King’s true faithful servant. This becomes a crucial turning point in the Shushan saga, and the tide begins to turn against Haman and in favor of the Jews.

The Geulah came about because Esther originally conveyed the information of the plot against Ahasuerus’ life in the name of Mordechai and did not try to achieve the credit for herself.  In a very indirect fashion there is a link between an idea in Parshat Tezaveh and Megillat Esther which are often read during the same week.

 

שחמט דיגיטל
האתר שלך קינג

]]>
https://ravweisz.co.il/tezaveh-tzitz-geulah-and-megilat-esther/feed/ 0
Elementor #8790 https://ravweisz.co.il/elementor-8790/ https://ravweisz.co.il/elementor-8790/#respond Wed, 26 Jan 2022 09:17:08 +0000 https://ravweisz.co.il/?p=8790

Terumah-purim-yom kippurim

Then Moses assembled the whole Israelite community and said to them. (Exodus 35:1)

When the people saw that Moses was so long in coming down from the mountain, the people assembled against Aaron and said to him. (Exodus 32:1)

 

 

In Parshat, Ki-Tissa, Moses descended from Mount Sinai bearing a second set of tablets and tidings for the people: the Lord had forgiven them for the Golden Calf. Moreover, as this story develops in the beginning of the next ParshaVayakhel,  the Holy One, blessed be He, wished to have His Presence dwell among the Israelites, and so He commanded them to build the Tabernacle (Mishkan) (35:11). In the first sentence of Parshat Vayakhel, Moses brings all the Israelites together to tell them about the building of the Mishkan.

 

This Parasha begins with the word ‘VaYakhel – [Moses] assembled’. The root kahal, like the word kehilah, means congregation. The word echoes ‘VaYakhel – The people assembled’ which also appeared in last week’s story of the Golden Calf and provides a link between the situation before the making of Golden Calf and the building of the Tabernacle.  The Torah in Parshat Ki Tisa says on the making of the Golden Calf (Egel Hazahav), “Vayakhel ha’am al Aharon” (32:1) which seems to imply a unifying process to be used against the epitome of peace, Aharon, an Assembly of dissention to the extent that thereafter each tribe worshipped a different Golden Calf.

 

The word Vayakhel — Assembling together of all the Israelites (Kol B’nai Yisrael), introduces the building of the Mishkan, the forerunner of the Temple (Beit HaMikdash), which serves as a kappara for the Eigel Zahav

 

All the Israelites were gathered together for this announcement, because unity had to be achieved in order to build the Mishkan. This event occurred on the day after Yom Kippur because then all been united in their prayers, as they had been at the Revelation,

Upon arriving in the Sinai wilderness, B’nai Yisrael encamped opposite the mountain. The singular verb “vayichan” is applied to the collective noun “B’nai Yisrael”, Rashi cites the Midrash which states that the singular verb is employed to signify that Bnai Yisrael were unified “ke’ish echad beleiv echad” – “as one man with one heart.  That unity lasted only 40 days until the worshipping of the Golden Calf.  It was then broken and now that unity had once again been achieved as indicated by the use of the verb Vayakhel,  the necessary basic requirement to be able to work together on building the Tabernacle, which served to be a rectification (tikkun) for the sin of the Golden calf, had been reinstituted.

 

R’ Shlomo Alkabetz (author of the L’cha Dodi prayer and the book Manot Halevi on Megillat Esther) finds a similarity in the Purim story. When Esther tells Mordecai about her plight, she orders him (4:16) to gather together all the Jews. This was done to counteract Haman’s observation that the Jews were scattered amongst the peoples of Persia and Media and were characterized by strife and disunity (3:8). Once the Jews were organized and unified they prayed for Esther’s success (9:2).

Esther and Mordechai wished this feeling of unity, friendship and harmony to continue amongst the Jews and the therefore instituted a novel method to ensure the continuing harmony amongst Jewish people :the mitzvah of giving Mishloach Manot (Purim gifts) described in the Book of Esther, meant according to R’ Shlomo Alkabetz,  to increase love and friendship among Jews.

We can also see how great the power of Purim is, even greater than that of Yom Kippur. Before Yom Kippur a person will approach his friend and ask for forgiveness. This can act to mend fissures in a friendship. On the other hand if a person sends Mishloach Manot to someone that he is not friendly with, he can create new relationships where there previously might have been enmity.

 We should only see togetherness and an increase peace and friendship among the Jewish people.

 

 

שחמט דיגיטל
האתר שלך קינג

]]>
https://ravweisz.co.il/elementor-8790/feed/ 0
Mishpatim- on bribery and corrupion and Tzadikim https://ravweisz.co.il/mishpatim-on-bribery-and-corrupion-and-tzadikim/ https://ravweisz.co.il/mishpatim-on-bribery-and-corrupion-and-tzadikim/#respond Wed, 26 Jan 2022 09:16:03 +0000 https://ravweisz.co.il/?p=8785

Mishpatim- on bribery and corrupion and Tzadikim

Mishpatim- on bribery and corrupion and tzadikim

“You shall not take a bribe, for the bribe will blind those who can see and will pervert the words of the righteous (Divrei Tzadikim).” (Exodus 23:8)

In Parshat Shoftim, we again encounter the Torah’s emphatic injunction against taking bribes. Deuteronomy 16:19 states: “Lo ta’teh mish’pat, lo tahkeer paneem, v’lo teekach sho’chad, kee ha’sho’chad ya’ahvayr aynay chachamim, vee’sah’layf divrei tzadikim” “You shall not pervert judgment, you shall not respect anyone’s status, and you shall not accept a bribe, for the bribe will blind the eyes of the wise and pervert the words of the righteous.”

Rashi translates: “Divrei Tzadikim“: Words that are righteous; judgments of truth.”

Rashi does not translate Divrei Tzadikim as “the words of righteous men” but as “the words of righteous things” Why does Rashi reject translation of Divrei Tzadikim as “the words of righteous men “?

Rashi cannot reconcile judges who take bribes as being described as “righteous people.” It is a contradiction in terms! Therefore, explains Rashi it is the words — not the judges –that are righteous, coming as they do, from the Torah.

I have heard an alternative explanation which would render the translation of Divrei Tzadikim as “The words of righteous men”. If that is the translation we may we ask whether the judges who take bribes can be designated as righteous. Indeed, the righteous do not take bribes, but in the courts of the righteous are Pikchim –” those who can see” such as advisors and assistants and it is the latter who are “open eyed ” and can be bribed and it is they who pervert the words of the righteous (Divrei Tzadikim).

 

 

]]>
https://ravweisz.co.il/mishpatim-on-bribery-and-corrupion-and-tzadikim/feed/ 0
Mishpatim-Parents Time and Shabbat https://ravweisz.co.il/mishpatim-parents-time-and-shabbat/ https://ravweisz.co.il/mishpatim-parents-time-and-shabbat/#respond Wed, 26 Jan 2022 09:15:02 +0000 https://ravweisz.co.il/?p=8780

Mishpatim-Parents Time and Shabbat

Mishpatim-Parents Time and Shabbat

The Torah (Vayikra 19:3) states that “a person must fear his mother and father and observe the Shabbat.” Why does the Torah connect the honoring of parents to Shabbat observance? Although there may be several answers to this question (see Rashi and the Sifra), when it comes to Shmirat Shabbat (Shabbat observance), one cannot be too busy, to observe, and not, Chas V’shalom (Heaven forbid), violate Shabbat. Once Shabbat arrives, one cannot say one needs “another five minutes” or that one “will do it later” because one is too busy. So too, when it comes to parents (especially elderly parents), no matter how busy one is—even if one is the busiest person in the world—ONE CAN NEVER BE TOO BUSY to have time for one’s parents. Every person must apply this great insight to his/her circumstances. Your parents are like your Shabbat. This is what the Torah teaches us by juxtaposing “a person must fear his mother and father and observe the Shabbat.”

The mitzvah (commandment), to show honor to one’s parents is the Fifth of the Ten Commandments. “Honor your father and your mother, so that your days will be lengthened on the land that Hashem, your G-d gives you.” (Shemot 20:12)

Why is the reward of honoring your parents specifically stated to be the lengthening of one’s days? One of the barriers to the proper performance of Kibbud Av V’aim (honoring parents) is the feeling we have that parents take up and control our time! As children, resentment is expressed against parents who do not allow playtime, spending time out of the house and they decide what the children should do with their time. Once grown up and having developed their own lifestyle, there comes a time in life when children have to have patience for their parents who may become demanding; attending to their needs becomes time consuming and children ask themselves – “Is there not a limit to the time and patience?” How much time is required to expend on parents, especially considering today’s extended health and life expectancy?

It is to this issue that remains with children throughout their life, that the Torah concerns itself and says.: “Honor your father and your mother, so that your days will be lengthened” – the understanding is that “I will add on the time that you have expended on your parents and accordingly lengthen your days. You will have not spent your time but you will be rewarded for your time by the lengthening of your days”.

 

 

 

 

 

 

]]>
https://ravweisz.co.il/mishpatim-parents-time-and-shabbat/feed/ 0
Parshas Yisro -THE FIRST MAN TO SAY THANK YOU! https://ravweisz.co.il/parshas-yisro-the-first-man-to-say-thank-you/ https://ravweisz.co.il/parshas-yisro-the-first-man-to-say-thank-you/#respond Wed, 26 Jan 2022 09:13:46 +0000 https://ravweisz.co.il/?p=8775

Parshas Yisro -THE FIRST MAN TO SAY THANK YOU!

“Blessed be the Lord who delivered you from the Egyptians and from Pharaoh… Now I  know that the Lord is greater than all the gods” (Shemos 18:10-11).

Reb Papayus maintained that it was a disgrace that Moshe and the 600,000 [Children of Israel that left Egypt] did not say “Baruch Hashem [Bless the Lord],” until Yitro came and said “Baruch Hashem“(Sanhedrin 94a).

It is noteworthy that our Sages were outspokenly critical of both Moshe and the rest of our nation for not having said Baruch Hashem!

How remarkable that Chazal noted that Yitro was the first to say Baruch Hashem and praise G-d. The song that the Bnei Yisrael [Children of Israel ] sang when they came out of Egypt [Shirat Hayam ], praised G-d. Why then does Yitro get the credit for being the first to praise G-d when the Children of Israel had already shown their appreciation and praise to G-d when they left Egypt?

The answer to this question may be found by a study of Shirat Hayam. In that whole text there is no mention of Bnei Yisrael being saved from slavery and their release from Egypt. Indeed, Bnei Yisrael praised G-d for destroying the Egyptians “This is my G-d,(as if to emphasize my G-d won), I should glorify him” but they forgot about their redemption which was in fact far more important for them than the destruction of the Egyptians.  One is reminded of when one gives a child a present, he holds on to it tightly and says “it’s mine, it’s mine” and he doesn’t let anyone touch it.  He is so busy saying its mine that he doesn’t have the time to actually enjoy the gift. The Bnei Yisrael were similarly immature in that they did not incorporate into the Shira their thanks for their freedom. Not only that, but as the Children of Israel praise to G-d, the angels wished to sing as well. G-d objects to the  angels doig so, saying: “The works of my hands are drowning in the sea, and you wish to sing praises!”

Indeed the Bnei Yisrael did not say Baruch Hashem for being saved!!

We have here a remarkable insight in to the nature of Man. We feel grateful and are prepared with joy and happiness to praise Him for all His attributes. At the same time, it is difficult for us to say thank you for Him helping us. We do not wish to declare that we ourselves are beholden to our Benefactor, for we could not have survived with out His help.

Similarly in our relations with our fellowman to whom we are beholden, we may say “You are a wonderful person, you help so many people” and similar statements of general appreciation. However, to say thank you for saving me- I would not be here without your aid and assistance, is more difficult.

Yitro was the first to specifically thank G-d. “Blessed be the Lord who delivered you from the Egyptians and from Pharaoh” Only afterwards he gave a general thank you. “… Now I know that the Lord is greater than all the gods” (18:10-11).

 

 

]]>
https://ravweisz.co.il/parshas-yisro-the-first-man-to-say-thank-you/feed/ 0
Parshat Beshalach -“A wise choice.” https://ravweisz.co.il/parshat-beshalach-a-wise-choice/ https://ravweisz.co.il/parshat-beshalach-a-wise-choice/#respond Wed, 26 Jan 2022 09:09:56 +0000 https://ravweisz.co.il/?p=8765

Parshat Beshalach -“A wise choice.”

Moshe took the bones of Yosef with him…” (Exodus 13:19)

The Midrash relates that while Bnei Yisrael [Israelites] were preoccupied with obtaining the wealth of the Egyptians before leaving Egypt, Moshe was busy searching for the coffin of Yosef in order to ensure that his remains be transported to Eretz Yisrael for burial, thereby fulfilling the oath that Yosef that Yosef had extracted from Klal Yisrael that they would remove his remains from Egypt when they left and take them with them.

 

The Midrash continues that the verse in the book of Proverbs “Chacham lev yikach mitzvot” – “The wise hearted take (for themselves) the mitzvot” refers to Moshe/

The implication of the Midrash is that Moshe concerned himself with the performance of mitzvot  while the rest of Bnei Yisrael were self-indulgent, occupying themselves  with satisfying their own wants:

 

 “Come see how beloved mitzvot were to Moshe, for when the Bnei Yisrael  were involved in demanding spoils from their former Egyptian slave masters, Moshe involved himself in collecting the bones of Yosef [for burial in Eretz Yisrael]”.

 

In the previous Parsha, Bo, Hashem requested Moshe to urge Bnei Yisrael to take the valuables of the Egyptians prior to departing Egypt so that our Patriarch Avraham would not complain that Hashem had not fulfilled his promise [to Avraham ] that his descendents would leave Egypt with “rechush gadol”  – many possessions.  Thus, in taking the Egyptians’ valuables Bnei Yisrael  were fulfilling the commandment of Hashem.

 

This Midrash deserves explanation: Why does the Midrash not view the actions of  the Israelites demanding the spoils from Egypt as the performance of a mitzva? Why is Moshe described as “chacham” – “wise” for performing a mitzva. Should we not expect to find the appellation “tzadik” – “righteous” as a more correct description of one who performs a mitzva? Are we to understand that without reference to this episode we would not know that Moshe Rabbeinu loved mitzvot?! Why is proof needed from the episode of Moshe gathering Yosef’s bones to establish that he loved mitzvoth? Why must the Talmud (Gemara) contrast Moshe’s behavior with that of the Israelites to prove this point? Does Moshe’s behavior not stand on its own as proof? Why can’t this good deed alone, without being contrasted with Bnei Yisrael’s gathering of the spoils, be an example of Moshe’s performance of mitzvot?

 Of course Moshe Rabbeinu loved mitzvot and the Sages (Chazal) credit Moshe specifically on this occasion for his performance of Mitzvot because Moshe alone had the ability to rise to the challenge of their performance even when faced with objective difficulty to do so. When the rest of Bnei Yisrael went to loot the Egyptians, Moshe showed individuality and independent thinking.  Precisely at this moment, Moshe swam against the tide and was concerned with the mitzva of  collecting the bones of Yosef.

 

Doing mitzvot when it is socially encouraged and fits one’s schedule and needs is valuable; doing mitzvot when we have to be different from others  and  overcome the challenge of inconvenience is “chacham lev yikach mitzvot”.  Hence, Moshe’s behavior contrasts with that of the Bnei Yisrael. Moshe Rabbenu was concerned with communal responsibility [gathering Yosef’s bones], whereas the rest of the nation engaged in the performance of their individual tasks.

Great objectivity and  ability to be uninfluenced by emotions or personal prejudices is required for a person to choose to perform a mitzva which is not for his/her direct benefit over a mitzva which does. The Chacham is defined as one who learns from every man, for he has the objectivity to put aside his own perspective for those of others. Therefore in this instance “Moshe is described as “Chacham

 

Throughout our lives we are faced with choices that pit the benefit of others against those of our own.  Each option may even qualify as a mitzva,  making the choice more difficult. It is easy to rationalize our actions as appropriate if they qualify as mitzvot. However, the right choice must be concluded objectively, and not based upon our own personal agenda.

]]>
https://ravweisz.co.il/parshat-beshalach-a-wise-choice/feed/ 0